abox.tools

Language: English

How to take a passport photo that is not sent back

A passport photo is not a picture of your face at a particular size. It is a set of measurements, and the ones that fail are almost never the ones people worry about. This is what is actually measured, which country wants which figures, and what to do about the forms that reject a file for being too small.

Open the ID Photo Maker Choose a supported country and document. Published rules and guidance are marked.

View as Markdown

The short answer

Stand a metre and a half from a plain, evenly lit wall — not against it. Have somebody else hold the phone at your eye level and take the picture. Do not use the front camera at arm’s length. Then open the ID Photo Maker and pick your country and document. It puts four dots on your crown, your chin and each pupil by measuring the picture, and tells you which of the four it could not measure; drag any that landed wrong, then press Fit the box.

Everything below is why each of those sentences is in there, and what to do when the numbers still come out wrong.

What is actually being measured

Every passport photo standard in the world is a variation on one document: ICAO Doc 9303, which is what makes a passport machine-readable at a border. It constrains two things about the picture, and they are not the two things people expect.

The size of the print — ⁦35 × 45⁩ mm across most of the world, ⁦2 × 2⁩ inches in the United States and India, ⁦50 × 70⁩ mm in Canada — is the easy part, and it is the part most tools get right and stop at. Getting the shape right and the head height wrong produces a photograph that looks completely fine and is refused.

The specification card for a United States passport photograph: two inches square, the head between one and one and three-eighths inches, a white background, and a note naming the authority the figures came from.
The rules for one document, in one place, with their source named. Every number the rest of this guide talks about is on this card.

The head height is the one everybody gets wrong

There are two reasons, and they pull in opposite directions.

The selfie problem. An arm is about sixty centimetres long. A lens that close both distorts the face — the nose grows, the ears shrink — and fills the frame with head, so the crop that contains your whole head has almost no room around it. Some countries will reject the distortion on its own. Getting somebody else to hold the phone a metre and a half away, and cropping in afterwards, fixes both at once.

The hairline problem. “Crown” means the very top of your head with your hair as it is. People move that dot down to their hairline, which makes the measured head shorter than the real one, which makes every crop come out with the head too small. If you have tall or voluminous hair, the crown is the top of it.

And the two bands are not the same everywhere, which is the part that catches people who have done this before. The UK asks for 29 to 34 mm of a 45 mm frame. Germany and the Schengen visa ask for 32 to 36 mm of the same frame. A photo cropped to the German rule is at the very top of the British one or over it, and a photo that passed for a Schengen visa can come back from Durham.

The background is what actually gets photos rejected

Almost nobody submits a photo with a bookcase in it. Enormous numbers of people submit one taken a foot from a white wall, with a soft grey shadow of their own head on it. “Plain white background” is not a statement about paint. It is a statement about shadows.

Three things fix nearly all of it:

Note that light grey is the ICAO preference rather than white. It separates a fair face from the background and dark hair from it as well, and pure white does neither. Several countries say “white or off-white” and mean “plain and even”.

The things a human examiner is looking at

No tool can measure these, so they are worth a paragraph of their own. They are also, together, the second most common reason a photograph is returned.

Print size, DPI, and why a file can print at the wrong size

A digital picture has no physical size until something decides how many of its pixels go in an inch. That number lives in the file — and when a web browser writes a JPEG, it writes that field as “this is an aspect ratio, not a resolution”. So the file says nothing about how large it is, and whatever prints it guesses.

That is why a photo that is exactly the right number of pixels can still come out of a print shop the wrong size. ⁦413 × 531⁩ pixels is ⁦35 × 45⁩ mm, but only at 300 dpi, and only if the file says so. Any tool worth using writes that in; the ID Photo Maker rewrites those few bytes directly, without decoding the picture.

300 dpi is the floor almost every specification states. 600 is what a good photo lab will use, and costs nothing but file size.

The file-size rules that have a floor

Online forms are stricter than paper ones in a way that surprises people: several of them enforce a minimum file size as well as a maximum.

The reason for the floor is sensible — a file under it is usually a thumbnail somebody uploaded by mistake — and the consequence is awkward. A ⁦200 × 230⁩ photograph is 46,000 pixels. At the best quality a browser will write, it can still land at 15 KB, and there is no way to make it larger by compressing it less, because there is no less.

The honest fix is padding: a JPEG can carry a comment segment, every decoder skips it, and adding one makes the file longer without changing a single pixel of the picture. That is what the tool does, and it writes an English sentence into the padding saying so. Beware of anything that reaches the floor by upscaling your photo instead — that is real quality thrown away to hit a number.

Printing them yourself, cheaply

A booth charges several pounds for six photographs. Any photo counter will print a ⁦6 × 4⁩ for pennies, and a ⁦6 × 4⁩ holds eight ⁦35 × 45⁩ mm photographs with room for the scissors.

Two things to get right when you send one:

Why none of this needs an upload

Every step above is arithmetic on a picture your own machine has already decoded: a crop rectangle, a scale, a colour average, a JPEG encode, and a handful of bytes in a header. There is nothing in it that a server can do and a browser cannot.

Which is worth pausing on, because of what the file is. A passport photo is a picture of your face, and uploading one to a website tells that website your face, the country whose document you are applying for, and roughly when you applied. Photo tools that require an upload usually require an account too, and the combination is a database of exactly that. There is no technical reason for it to exist. See how to tell whether a tool really needs your files for the four checks that separate the ones that do from the ones that do not.